[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-2449?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Ben Keen updated COUCHDB-2449:
------------------------------
    Description: 
In the sidebar, there's a "Documentation" option. It appears to always link to 
this URL:
http://yoursite:8000/_utils/docs/intro/api.html#documents

That location in the doc is specifically about Documents, which is interesting, 
but doesn't feel like the place a primary Documentation link should go. In 
addition, having that nav item link to an off-script page also feels rather 
jolting.

Inside the API URL bar tray that appears on many pages, there's a little "?" 
icon next to the title that links to a relevant documentation page. That's much 
more useful, but largely hidden.

I suggest one of two things:
1. removing the Documentation page altogether from the sidebar, putting in a 
more prominent "?" next to the title of the page ("Databases", "Config", 
"Replication" and others - any page with a relevant corresponding doc page), 
and dropping the "?" from the API Url bar.

2. Leaving the Documentation sidebar item there, but have it link to a page 
within Fauxton. That would have a (short) blurb introducing the documentation, 
with a few key links. It could also points out the "?" links suggested in #1 
above (which I think it's a pretty good idea to add in one form or other).

I won't tackle this until I get a +1 or two... seems a little aggressive 
without getting consensus.

  was:
In the sidebar, there's a "Documentation" option. It appears to always link to 
this URL:
http://yoursite:8000/_utils/docs/intro/api.html#documents

That's a bit odd, I think. That location in the doc is specifically about 
Documents, which is interesting, but not the only thing a person would be 
interested in.

Inside the API URL bar tray that appears on many pages, there's a little "?" 
icon next to the title that links to a relevant documentation page. That's much 
more useful, but largely hidden.

I suggest removing the Documentation page altogether from the sidebar, putting 
in a more prominent "?" next to the title of the page ("Databases", "Config", 
"Replication" and others - any page with a relevant corresponding doc page), 
and dropping the "?" from the API Url bar.

I won't tackle this until I get a +1 or two... seems a little aggressive 
without getting consensus.


> Fix Documentation links within Fauxton
> --------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: COUCHDB-2449
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-2449
>             Project: CouchDB
>          Issue Type: Bug
>      Security Level: public(Regular issues) 
>          Components: Fauxton
>            Reporter: Ben Keen
>            Assignee: Ben Keen
>
> In the sidebar, there's a "Documentation" option. It appears to always link 
> to this URL:
> http://yoursite:8000/_utils/docs/intro/api.html#documents
> That location in the doc is specifically about Documents, which is 
> interesting, but doesn't feel like the place a primary Documentation link 
> should go. In addition, having that nav item link to an off-script page also 
> feels rather jolting.
> Inside the API URL bar tray that appears on many pages, there's a little "?" 
> icon next to the title that links to a relevant documentation page. That's 
> much more useful, but largely hidden.
> I suggest one of two things:
> 1. removing the Documentation page altogether from the sidebar, putting in a 
> more prominent "?" next to the title of the page ("Databases", "Config", 
> "Replication" and others - any page with a relevant corresponding doc page), 
> and dropping the "?" from the API Url bar.
> 2. Leaving the Documentation sidebar item there, but have it link to a page 
> within Fauxton. That would have a (short) blurb introducing the 
> documentation, with a few key links. It could also points out the "?" links 
> suggested in #1 above (which I think it's a pretty good idea to add in one 
> form or other).
> I won't tackle this until I get a +1 or two... seems a little aggressive 
> without getting consensus.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to