[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1218?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14214056#comment-14214056 ]
Robert Newson commented on COUCHDB-1218: ---------------------------------------- I'd close it as fixed / obsoleted by the introduction of lager, yes. > Better logger performance > ------------------------- > > Key: COUCHDB-1218 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1218 > Project: CouchDB > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Filipe Manana > Assignee: Filipe Manana > Attachments: 0001-Better-logger-performance.patch > > > I made some experiments with OTP's disk_log module (available since 2001 at > least) to use it to manage the log file. > It turns out I got better throughput by using it. Basically it adopts a > strategy similar to the asynchronous couch_file Damien described in this > thread: > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/couchdb-dev/201106.mbox/%3c5c39fb5a-0aca-4ff9-bd90-2ebecf271...@apache.org%3E > Here's a benchmark with relaximation, 50 writers, 100 readers, documents of > 1Kb, delayed_commits set to false and 'info' log level (default): > http://graphs.mikeal.couchone.com/#/graph/9e19f6d9eeb318c70cabcf67bc013c7f > The reads got a better throughput (bottom graph, easier to visualize). > The patch (also attached here), which has a descriptive comment, is at: > https://github.com/fdmanana/couchdb/compare/logger_perf.patch -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)