> On 10 Sep 2015, at 20:20, Alexander Shorin <kxe...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 8:53 PM, Jan Lehnardt <j...@apache.org> wrote: >>> On 10 Sep 2015, at 19:06, Alexander Shorin <kxe...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> -1. We need to fix this, not drop. >> >> The feature is already very poor, hard to understand and configure, and >> again, I don’t know anyone who is using this. “Fixing” this would, imho, >> mean, starting from scratch and making this properly, just restoring the >> half-baked 1.x state is not very pretty. >> >> That said, are you volunteering? :) > > Seems like there are no much options. > > I disagree that it's very poor. The only flaws it has is the lack of > RSA support (our implementation) and open security issues (as auth > protocol). But is there any good alternative?
I think dropping the feature us a good alternative, given that we have no maintainers (unless somebody steps up in this thread). Best Jan -- > > -- > ,,,^..^,,, -- Professional Support for Apache CouchDB: http://www.neighbourhood.ie/couchdb-support/
