Not at this stage. It is on the list of things to do if that is any
consolation


On Wed, 25 Jan 2017 at 8:54 PM Garth Gutenberg <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Is there an ETA on when this will be complete?
>
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Garren Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hi Garth,
> >
> > You are right. We have done the encoding for the _all_dbs section but
> > haven't finished the work for the database page.
> >
> > Cheers
> > Garren
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 4:45 PM, Garth Gutenberg <
> > [email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hey guys.  Sorry to revive this, but I don't think this fix is fully
> > > working.  In general it seems ok, but it's not applying to Views.
> Steps
> > to
> > > reproduce:
> > >
> > > Create a DB called "a/b".
> > > Create a new View (call it _design/test and "new-view" is fine)
> > > Under Design Documents in the left nav you'll see "test".  Expand it
> and
> > > click on "new-view".  Note that the DB is *not* urlencoded, and
> > navigation
> > > breaks.
> > >
> > > On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 1:27 PM, Garth Gutenberg <
> > [email protected]
> > > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thanks Robert.  I'll test that out next week.
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 5:04 PM, Robert Kowalski <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Hi Garth,
> > > >>
> > > >> I think it is already fixed on master:
> > > >> https://github.com/apache/couchdb-fauxton/commit/1aa4ca6f34a
> > > >> 718c294a06a1301f39fe05f157a1c
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:25 PM, Garth Gutenberg
> > > >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >> > Hey folks.  Fauxton is not URL encoding any of its navigation
> links
> > in
> > > >> > Couch 2.0.  It's a pretty major issue for us as all of our
> databases
> > > use
> > > >> > slashes in their names, which makes navigating around Fauxton
> > > >> unbearable.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > I created a ticket for it here https://issues.apache.
> > > >> > org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-3229 .
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Can someone please take a look at this issue?
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to