Thanks everyone. I figured there would be universal agreement.

PRs are live.

-Joan

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Robert Newson" <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Saturday, March 18, 2017 4:10:31 PM
> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Drop PDF / texinfo documentation builds
> 
> +1. Please use fire.
> 
> > On 18 Mar 2017, at 17:44, Robert Kowalski <[email protected]> wrote:
> > 
> > good idea, +1
> > 
> >> On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 9:14 AM, Jan Lehnardt <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> 
> >> +1
> >> 
> >> Cheers
> >> Jan
> >> --
> >> 
> >>> On 18 Mar 2017, at 05:55, Joan Touzet <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>> 
> >>> Hi everyone,
> >>> 
> >>> I'd like to propose dropping the PDF and texinfo targets from our
> >>> documentation build, or at the very least, having them not be
> >>> part of
> >>> the default target / not standard deliverables for the project.
> >>> 
> >>> We'd continue to build HTML documentation as part of the
> >>> workflow,
> >>> naturally, as well as the man pages.
> >>> 
> >>> I don't have any solid numbers, but I'm fairly sure most people
> >>> use
> >>> https://docs.couchdb.org/ or a locally installed copy for their
> >>> documentation for CouchDB rather than the PDF documentation. I
> >>> personally can't remember the last time I opened the docs in PDF
> >>> form. I
> >>> also have never seen anyone refer to the PDF docs on the mailing
> >>> lists,
> >>> IRC or Slack when asking for advice or support.
> >>> 
> >>> I've also never seen anyone use or talk about the texinfo target,
> >>> and
> >>> I've not used them myself.
> >>> 
> >>> Dropping this dependency will allow us to drop TeX/LaTeX from our
> >>> build
> >>> chain, which speeds up build times by about 90 seconds and
> >>> reduces the
> >>> size of containers currently being built for our Jenkins CI
> >>> workflow.
> >>> It also means CouchDB devs don't have to install 0.5-1.5GB worth
> >>> of
> >>> toolset.
> >>> 
> >>> I've captured this in JIRA as
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-3329 and have PRs
> >>> ready
> >>> to fire off if people agree.
> >>> 
> >>> Your thoughts?
> >>> 
> >>> -Joan
> >> 
> 

Reply via email to