>From an operational pov, the compaction daemon was removed in favour of
smoosh [1]. We owe some documentation around these new subsystems (smoosh,
ioq, ken) and some guides covering common cases (only compact during quiet
periods, disable compaction, etc) to aid migration.

[1] https://github.com/apache/couchdb/pull/1904

On Thu, 5 Sep 2019 at 03:17, Adam Kocoloski <kocol...@apache.org> wrote:

> I found a couple of other bits while grep’ing through the documentation
> for “deprecated”:
>
> > * The ``stale`` parameter for views and ``_find`` has been deprecated in
> favour
> >   of two new parameters: ``stable`` and ``update``. The old ``stale=ok``
> >   behaviour is equivalent to ``stable=true&update=false``, and the old
> >   ``stale=update_after`` behaviour is equivalent to
> ``stable=true&update=lazy``.
> >   The deprecated ``stale`` parameter will be removed in CouchDB 3.0.
>
> and
>
> > * :ghissue:`820`, :ghissue:`1032`: Multiple queries can now be made at
> the
> >   ``POST /{db}/_all_docs/queries``, ``POST /{db}/_design_docs/queries``
> and
> >   ``POST /{db}/_local_docs/queries`` endpoints. Also, a new endpoint
> >   ``POST /{db}/_design/{ddoc}/_view/{view}/queries`` has been introduced
> to replace
> >   the ``?queries`` parameter formerly provided for making multiple
> queries to a view.
> >   The old ``?queries`` parameter *is now deprecated and will be removed
> in a future
> >   release of CouchDB.*
>
> I’m not super-excited about following through on either of those
> deprecations :) I feel like the `stale` one in particular is still in heavy
> use. The queries one is probably OK.
>
> On the FDB topic, I believe the transaction logs are configured with the
> equivalent of delayed_commits=false (thus ensuring the durability of a
> transaction), while the storage servers only periodically fsync data that
> they pull off the transaction logs. I don’t think the fsync behavior can be
> configured using the normal configuration file, but if you go digging into
> the codebase there’s a Knobs file that has all kinds of settings that
> shouldn’t be messed with by mere mortals :) I wouldn’t be surprised if some
> of the durability settings can be tweaked there.
>
> Adam
>
> > On Sep 4, 2019, at 9:13 PM, Joan Touzet <woh...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 2019-09-04 20:53, Adam Kocoloski wrote:
> >> Great list, Joan, thanks. I created a handful of GitHub issues for the
> first two sections and tossed them in the “Proposed for 3.x” column. I also
> submitted a PR to address one of them :)
> >
> > Cheers! I've also retitled that column "3.0 Release Tasks" since I think
> > that's how we're treating it. If it turns out anything needs to be
> > bumped to 3.x, we can create a new column for that.
> >
> >> Out of that list of already-deprecated functionality the only one that
> gives me pause is the delayed_commits one. We haven’t talked about it in
> years, and we ship a safe default. I’d be a little concerned about breaking
> folks who intentionally switched it on with full knowledge of the tradeoffs.
> >
> > Another option would be to just remove the setting from default.ini and
> > the documentation.
> >
> > Does FDB have anything similar?
> >
> > -Joan
> >
> >> Adam
> >>
> >>> On Sep 4, 2019, at 5:44 PM, Johs Ensby <j...@b2w.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Much appreciated, Joan
> >>> You're a hero
> >>> Johs
> >>>
> >>>> On 4 Sep 2019, at 23:37, Joan Touzet <woh...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hey Adam,
> >>>>
> >>>>> When it comes to deprecating and/or removing functionality, I feel
> like I don’t know exactly where we stand today. We have occasionally
> described some of the CouchApp functionality as already being deprecated,
> but I’m having trouble finding any official record of that in our
> documentation.
> >>>> Thanks for re-opening the deprecation discussion. I've reviewed [1]
> and
> >>>> provide the following summary tables (Markdown format).
> >>>>
> >>>> **NOTE**: This is /not/ the vote for deprecation, nor a formal
> >>>> announcement of such. This is a starting point for discussion. A vote
> >>>> still needs to happen for this to move forward. Anything already
> >>>> deprecated in 2.0 can be removed in 3.0 without a formal vote, but
> it'd
> >>>> be nice if it got mentioned on the dev@ list before the PR lands on
> >>>> master, please.
> >>>>
> >>>> As I'm going to be travelling for most of the rest of September, I'd
> >>>> prefer if someone else (like Adam or Deni) can help drive this
> discussion.
> >>>>
> >>>> Once there is consensus from the community on these lists, we should
> >>>> close #1534 and split it into 3 new tickets based on the tables below
> >>>> (excepting the features already removed in 2.x).
> >>>>
> >>>>> I guess let’s start with: does anyone believe we are in a position
> to be eliminating previously-deprecated functionality in 3.0?
> >>>>
> >>>> Yes, for the items in the 2nd table below, absolutely.
> >>>>
> >>>> -Joan "turning the tables" Touzet
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --------
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> # Recently removed features in 2.x
> >>>>
> >>>> **Feature/Endpoint**                | **Links**
> >>>> ------------------------------------|------------
> >>>> update_notifications                | [10]
> >>>> ini-file based query servers        | [11]
> >>>> ini-file based HTTP global handlers | [11]
> >>>> OS daemons                          | [11],[12]
> >>>> vhost redirects/global handlers     | [11],[12]
> >>>> couch_httpd_proxy                   | [11],[12]
> >>>>
> >>>> *NOTE*: Some of these still have lingering bits in the documentation
> >>>>      that need a final cleanup pass before 3.0 should be released.
> >>>>
> >>>> --------
> >>>>
> >>>> # Already deprecated items, to be removed in 3.0
> >>>>
> >>>> **Feature/Endpoint**                | **Links**
> >>>> ------------------------------------|------------
> >>>> some duplicate dbinfo size fields   | [2],[3]
> >>>> delayed_commits                     | [4]
> >>>> port 5986                           | [5],[6]
> >>>> `/{db}/_external/*`                 | [7],[8]
> >>>> view-based changes (code remnants)  | [17],[18],[19],[20]
> >>>>
> >>>> --------
> >>>>
> >>>> # Proposed deprecations for 3.0, not rebuilt/removed in 4.0
> >>>>
> >>>> **Feature/Endpoint**   |    **Replaced by**   | **Links**
> >>>> --------------------------|----------------------|-----------
> >>>> `/{db}/{ddoc}/_show/*`    | App server/rev proxy | †
> >>>> `/{db}/{ddoc}/_list/*`    | App server/rev proxy | †
> >>>> virtual hosts [24]        | haproxy, multitenant | [25]
> >>>> `/{db}/{ddoc}/_rewrite/*` | App server/rev proxy | [26]
> >>>>
> >>>> †: getRow() makes embedding a new, efficient JS engine impossible
> since
> >>>> getRow() does not give up thread execution control; an entirely new
> >>>> approach would need to be constructed, breaking backward compatibility
> >>>> at the very least. (There are additional challenges.)
> >>>>
> >>>> --------
> >>>>
> >>>> # Likely will remain unchanged through 4.0
> >>>>
> >>>> **Feature/Endpoint**          |    **Improved by**
> >>>> ---------------------------------|----------------------
> >>>> VDU (validatefun()) [13]         | [14],[15]
> >>>> update handlers (updatefun) [16] | [14],[15]
> >>>> JS engine [21]                   | [22],[23]
> >>>> system DB special handling       | [27]
> >>>>
> >>>> *NOTE*: The last table may grow as limitations imposed by FDB are
> better
> >>>>      understood.
> >>>>
> >>>> --------
> >>>>
> >>>> # References
> >>>>
> >>>> [1]: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/issues/1534
> >>>> [2]:
> >>>>
> https://docs.couchdb.org/en/stable/api/database/common.html?highlight=disk-size#get--db
> >>>> [3]: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/pull/2163
> >>>> [4]:
> >>>>
> https://github.com/apache/couchdb/blob/103a0624f309ea0d796176a55eb5faea68f26047/test/javascript/tests/delayed_commits.js#L16
> >>>> [5]: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/issues/1523
> >>>> [6]: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/pull/2092
> >>>> [7]: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/pull/1330
> >>>> [8]: https://docs.couchdb.org/en/stable/whatsnew/2.2.html
> >>>> [10]: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/pull/1476
> >>>> [11]: https://docs.couchdb.org/en/stable/whatsnew/2.3.html
> >>>> [12]: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/pull/1602
> >>>> [13]: https://docs.couchdb.org/en/stable/ddocs/ddocs.html#vdufun
> >>>> [14]: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/issues/1554
> >>>> [15]: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/pull/1898
> >>>> [16]:
> https://docs.couchdb.org/en/stable/ddocs/ddocs.html#update-functions
> >>>> [17]: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/issues/592
> >>>> [18]: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/issues/831
> >>>> [19]:
> >>>>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/516793df0c1913c045441d0ff78339f307e2aff517d9223da44edd9e@%3Cdev.couchdb.apache.org%3E
> >>>> [20]:
> >>>>
> http://docs.couchdb.org/en/stable/api/database/changes.html?highlight=selector#selector
> >>>> [21]: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/issues/1513
> >>>> [22]: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/issues/1875
> >>>> [23]: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/issues/1884
> >>>> [24]:
> https://docs.couchdb.org/en/stable/config/http.html#virtual-hosts
> >>>> [25]: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/issues/1539
> >>>> [26]:
> >>>>
> https://docs.couchdb.org/en/stable/api/ddoc/rewrites.html#api-ddoc-rewrite
> >>>> [27]: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/issues/1534
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> ………………………………………
> >>> Johannes Ensby
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Business to Web AS
> >>> Tollbugata 8, N- 0152 Oslo, Norway
> >>> +47 611 00 006 (mobile)
> >>> +47 611 00 700 (switchboard)
> >>> j...@b2w.com
> >>> www.linkedin.com/in/ensby
> >>> www.b2w.com
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
>

Reply via email to