Hi, I’m fine with a release either side of Christmas but I agree with Joan’s point.
I suggest a compromise of a code freeze. Only fixes for 3.0 to be merged until the new year then do the release dance. > On 4 Dec 2019, at 14:45, support-tiger <supp...@tigernassau.com> wrote: > > fyi: Every year Ruby releases a new major version on Christmas - has become a > tradition with the user base - so no need to worry about holidays but > obviously must be ready to ship. > > Do not forget about PR - I have seen little on the web about the upcoming > major version release. What are the major new features ? (not just a > changelog). How about a review from someone trying out the beta or RC. > > One more thing: node express crud example ? (if you want to attract users to > a JSON database) > > And one more thing: are Fedora, Debian, Ubuntu pkgs ready ? > > >> On 12/4/19 6:43 AM, Denitsa Burroughs wrote: >> Hi Joan, >> >> Point taken. Let's see what the rest of the PMC members thinks. Just to be >> clear: I had spoken to Bob about helping with the release activities, so I >> wasn't expecting this to land on you. :) >> >> I think that the biggest challenge would be getting the release notes and >> documentation ready. I would appreciate some feedback on areas that are >> lacking (if any) so that I can track it. Happy to open a ticket where we >> could capture a list if that makes sense. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Deni >> >>> On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 1:08 AM Joan Touzet <woh...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>> Deni, >>> >>> Is it wise to rush out a 3.0 release prior to the holidays? I don't >>> think so. Practically speaking we have 2 weeks before people start >>> disappearing (including me, I'm gone as of Dec 18) and I don't think >>> we'll get either the critical mass for testing, nor the attention from >>> our release channels, if we rush to get it done before then. >>> >>> Consider this an informal desire to push off the RC/release process >>> until January 2020. If the rest of the PMC want to push ahead (knowing I >>> won't be here to help, and are ready to do it themselves), go for it. >>> >>> -Joan >>> >>>> On 2019-12-04 12:47 a.m., Jan Lehnardt wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 4. Dec 2019, at 05:32, Denitsa Burroughs < >>> denitsa.burrou...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> We are really close to merging the last few open PRs for CouchDB 3.0. >>> I'd >>>>> like to propose that we aim to merge all remaining changes *by the end >>> of >>>>> the week* (Dec 6th) and work on a first RC next week. Please let me >>> know if >>>>> you don't think you could meet that goal. Also, last call for any >>>>> additional change requests! >>>>> Here's the current status: >>>>> >>>>> *In progress:* >>>>> - 2167 Remove vestiges of view-based `_changes` feed >>>>> <https://github.com/apache/couchdb/issues/2167> *(Eric) **- PR >>> reviewed, >>>>> addressing comments* >>>>> - 1875 Update SpiderMonkey version >>>>> <https://github.com/apache/couchdb/issues/1875> *(Peng Hui)* *- PR >>>>> reviewed, addressing comments* >>>>> - 2171 Document new management subsystems (smoosh, ioq, ken) >>>>> <https://github.com/apache/couchdb/issues/2171>-ioq left. *(Adam) **- >>> ioq >>>>> only, doc ticket, not a blocker* >>>>> - 1524 Per-document access control #1524 >>>>> <https://github.com/apache/couchdb/issues/1524> *(Jan)* - >>>>> *Need an ETA* >>>> Def not before Christmas, but as stated, happy to leave this for 3.1 or >>> later. EXCEPT for one patch to accept the _access member in docs. >>>> Im travelling internationally until the end of *next* week, so I can't >>> promise that before Dec 13. >>>> It is a relatively minor patch, though, so we might be okay with >>> sneaking it during the RC phase. >>>> Best >>>> Jan >>>> — >>>> >>>>> - 2249 Cluster setup does not create IOQ stats database >>>>> <https://github.com/apache/couchdb/issues/2249> *(Adam) **- ETA Dec 6 >>> * >>>>> *Backlog:* >>>>> *- *2191 Tighten up security model >>>>> <https://github.com/apache/couchdb/issues/2191> *- **(TBD)** change db >>>>> security to admin_only, small change* >>>>> - Release Notes >>>>> - Blog posts (see Jan's email) >>>>> >>>>> Thanks! >>>>> >>>>> Deni > > -- > Support Dept > Tiger Nassau, Inc. > www.tigernassau.com > 406-624-9310 > > >