Thanks Joan for highlighting the problem; the image has been removed from DockerHub.
On Mon, 3 Feb 2020 at 17:46, Joan Touzet <woh...@apache.org> wrote: > On 2020-02-03 12:34, Jan Lehnardt wrote: > > Thanks Joan for raising this, > > > > I’m throwing in an extra “this is bad” because of the version number. > 3.0 is not a thing yet and we have brought that up with several IBMers that > calling anything intermediate “CouchDB3” (this is isn’t the first time) is > problematic in the CouchDB Slack. > > > > Y’all need to do better. Is suggest the removal of this image blocks the > 3.0.0 release, to make sure nobody gets the wrong bits. > > > I agree - I was going to fork 3.x and 3.0.x today but I'll hold off > until this gets resolved. We still have 2 documentation issues that need > to be resolved, and verification of the Windows build, before we can > release anyway. > > -Joan > > > > > Best > > Jan > > — > > > >> On 3. Feb 2020, at 18:08, Joan Touzet <woh...@apache.org> wrote: > >> > >> Hi IBM people, > >> > >> https://hub.docker.com/r/ibmcom/couchdb3 > >> > >> This is a problem, especially because i'm seeing 50K+ pulls on this > image already. > >> > >> We've not yet released CouchDB 3.0. Any use of this image outside of > our immediate developer community is a direct violation of Apache release > protocols, and could result in serious problems down the road. > >> > >> If you need a dev image for CouchDB to build Fauxton, that's one thing > - but that image needs to be built each time, or hosted on a *private* > repository with credentials. > >> > >> Please take this image offline immediately. > >> > >> -Joan "not messing around" Touzet > > >
