This was fixed by updating the agent on the FreeBSD machines.

On 18/06/2020 11:20, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
FWIW, I’m getting this here on the FreeBSD build:

Remote call on JNLP4-connect connection from 67.223.99.43/67.223.99.43:61326 
failed

https://ci-couchdb.apache.org/blue/organizations/jenkins/jenkins-cm1%2FFullPlatformMatrix/detail/master/178/pipeline

Best
Jan
—


On 17. Jun 2020, at 23:16, Alessio 'Blaster' Biancalana 
<dottorblas...@apache.org> wrote:

Thanks for the response Paul!
Same stuff, I tried rerunning the job but it looks stuck with that error

https://ci-couchdb.apache.org/blue/organizations/jenkins/jenkins-cm1%2FPullRequests/detail/PR-2893/6/pipeline

I don't know why that happens, if you have any clue...

Thanks,
Alessio

Il mer 17 giu 2020, 23:01 Paul Davis <paul.joseph.da...@gmail.com> ha
scritto:

I looked at Jenkins and saw them all as connected and in sync. Is
there more to the report or was this some sort of networking burb?

On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 2:20 PM Joan Touzet <woh...@apache.org> wrote:

IBM maintains these workers for us - will have to ask Paul Davis to take
a look.

-Joan

On 17/06/2020 05:36, Alessio 'Blaster' Biancalana wrote:
Hey folks,
I have a job on Jenkins that is repeatedly giving me this error:

  <
https://ci-couchdb.apache.org/blue/organizations/jenkins/jenkins-cm1%2FPullRequests/detail/PR-2893/4/pipeline/#step-117-log-1
[2020-06-17T09:09:49.584Z]
Recording test results
  <
https://ci-couchdb.apache.org/blue/organizations/jenkins/jenkins-cm1%2FPullRequests/detail/PR-2893/4/pipeline/#step-117-log-2
[2020-06-17T09:09:49.718Z]
Remote call on JNLP4-connect connection from
76.9a.30a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com/169.48.154.118:7778 failed
  <
https://ci-couchdb.apache.org/blue/organizations/jenkins/jenkins-cm1%2FPullRequests/detail/PR-2893/4/pipeline/#step-117-log-3
Remote
call on JNLP4-connect connection from
76.9a.30a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com/169.48.154.118:7778 failed

I was wondering, is everything ok on our Jenkins cluster? Maybe there's
some maintenance I'm not aware of?

Cheers,
Alessio



Reply via email to