Also, I added an easier to digest list of repositories with their
planned actions to the gist [1]. I'm repasting here for historical
tracing.
Create `main` branch, update default branch and branch protections
===
* couchdb
* couchdb-admin
* couchdb-b64url
* couchdb-bear
* couchdb-ci
* couchdb-config
* couchdb-docker
* couchdb-documentation
* couchdb-erlfdb
* couchdb-escodegen
* couchdb-esprima
* couchdb-ets-lru
* couchdb-fauxton
* couchdb-folsom
* couchdb-glazier
* couchdb-helm
* couchdb-hqueue
* couchdb-hyper
* couchdb-ibrowse
* couchdb-ioq
* couchdb-jaeger-passage
* couchdb-jiffy
* couchdb-khash
* couchdb-local
* couchdb-meck
* couchdb-mochiweb
* couchdb-nano
* couchdb-passage
* couchdb-pkg
* couchdb-rebar
* couchdb-recon
* couchdb-snappy
* couchdb-thrift-protocol
Have infra set `asf-site` as default branch
===
* couchdb-www
Empty repositories to delete
===
* couchdb-fauxton-server
* couchdb-javascript-tests
* couchdb-query-server-spidermonkey
Repositories to archive
===
* couchdb-cassim
* couchdb-chttpd
* couchdb-couch
* couchdb-couch-collate
* couchdb-couch-dbupdates
* couchdb-couch-epi
* couchdb-couch-event
* couchdb-couch-httpd
* couchdb-couch-index
* couchdb-couch-log
* couchdb-couch-log-lager
* couchdb-couch-mrview
* couchdb-couch-plugins
* couchdb-couch-replicator
* couchdb-couch-stats
* couchdb-ddoc-cache
* couchdb-erlang-bcrypt
* couchdb-erlang-tests
* couchdb-examples
* couchdb-fabric
* couchdb-futon
* couchdb-global-changes
* couchdb-goldrush
* couchdb-jquery-couch
* couchdb-lager
* couchdb-mango
* couchdb-mem3
* couchdb-nmo
* couchdb-oauth
* couchdb-peruser
* couchdb-query-server-node
* couchdb-rexi
* couchdb-setup
* couchdb-smoosh
* couchdb-triq
* couchdb-twig
[1] https://gist.github.com/davisp/9de8fa167812f80356d4990e390c9351
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 10:49 AM Paul Davis <paul.joseph.da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Right. I figure that's basically an ASF version of the `gh-pages` branch?
>
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 10:39 AM Joan Touzet <woh...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 16/09/2020 11:39, Paul Davis wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 10:32 AM Joan Touzet <woh...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On 16/09/2020 10:57, Paul Davis wrote:
> > >>> Hey all,
> > >>>
> > >>> Here's a list of all CouchDB related repositories with a few quick
> > >>> stats and my read on their status and requirements. Can I get some
> > >>> eyeballs on this to double check before I submit a ticket to infra
> > >>> for doing our branch renaming updates?
> > >>>
> > >>> https://gist.github.com/davisp/9de8fa167812f80356d4990e390c9351
> > >>>
> > >>> There are a few repos with comments I had when I wasn't 100% sure on
> > >>> the status. For ease those are:
> > >>>
> > >>> couchdb-couch-collate - I couldn't easily tell if this was still
> > >>> used for Windows builds
> > >>
> > >> Nope
> > >>
> > >>> couchdb-fauxton-server - This is an empty repo, should we have it
> > >>> deleted?
> > >>
> > >> Sure
> > >>
> > >>> couchdb-jquery-couch - Should this be archived? Has PouchDB/nano
> > >>> replaced it?
> > >>
> > >> If I recall correctly this was part of Futon and 1.x releases?
> > >>
> > >>> couchdb-nmo - Should this be archived?
> > >>
> > >> Very old code from 2015 from Robert Kowalski to help set up
> > >> clusters/etc. I don't know anything about it, and it appears
> > >> unmaintained. +1 to archive
> > >>
> > >>> couchdb-oauth - I couldn't find this used anywhere, should we archive
> > >>
> > >> I remember using this extensively! 1.x asset. As we no longer officially
> > >> support it (or CouchDB "plugins" in this form), +1 to archive
> > >>
> > >>> couchdb-www - Should this be archived or included in the rename?
> > >>
> > >> We already have to use asf-site branch on this, and the 'master' branch
> > >> already says "you're on the wrong branch." Just have Infra change the
> > >> default branch to asf-site, no need to master -> main here IMO.
> > >>
> > >
> > > Want me to have infra change the default branch to `asf-site` on this
> > > repo?
> >
> > Yes please! No need to change to main here.
> >
> > -Joan
> >
> > >
> > > Everything else sounds good.
> > >
> > >>>
> > >>> Paul
> > >>>
> > >>> On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 6:28 AM Glynn Bird <glynnb...@apache.org>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> +1
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Happy to help reconfigure apache/couchdb-nano if necessary after
> > >>>> the switch to main
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Thu, 10 Sep 2020 at 10:40, Andy Wenk <andyw...@apache.org>
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> strong +1
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> here at sum.cumo we also change the “master” branches to main
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Best
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Andy -- Andy Wenk Hamburg
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> GPG fingerprint C32E 275F BCF3 9DF6 4E55 21BD 45D3 5653 77F9
> > >>>>> 3D29
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> On 9. Sep 2020, at 20:09, Joan Touzet <woh...@apache.org>
> > >>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> +1. Thanks for starting this, Paul. I was actually going to try
> > >>>>>> and
> > >>>>> drive this a month or two ago, but things got busy for me.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> I'd also support renaming it to 'trunk' but really don't care
> > >>>>>> what we
> > >>>>> pick.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> The first commercial version control system I used to use,
> > >>>>>> called that
> > >>>>> branch "main":
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> https://i.ibb.co/7bMDt3c/cc-ver-tree2.gif
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> -Joan "yes, that's motif" Touzet
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On 2020-09-09 11:40 a.m., Paul Davis wrote:
> > >>>>>>> Howdy Folks! Words matter. I've just started a thread on
> > >>>>>>> merging all of the FoundationDB work into mainline
> > >>>>>>> development and thought this would be a good time to bring up
> > >>>>>>> a separate discussion on renaming our default branch.
> > >>>>>>> Personally, I've got a few projects where I used `main` for
> > >>>>>>> the mainline development branch. I find it to be a fairly
> > >>>>>>> natural shift because I tab-complete everything on the
> > >>>>>>> command line. I'd be open to other suggestions but I'm also
> > >>>>>>> hoping this doesn't devolve into a bikeshed on what we end up
> > >>>>>>> picking. For mechanics, what I'm thinking is that when we
> > >>>>>>> finish up the last rebase of the FoundationDB work that
> > >>>>>>> instead of actually pushing the merge/rebase button we just
> > >>>>>>> rename the branch and then change the default branch on
> > >>>>>>> GitHub and close the PR. Thoughts? Paul
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
