Thank you, all! It looks like the vote passed and this will become the 3.1.2 release.
-Nick On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 7:41 PM Joan Touzet <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 28/09/2021 10:53, Nick Vatamaniuc wrote: > > Thanks for taking a look, Joan > > > > I just highlighted the docs in the email diff but the tarball should > > contain the differences and they should match the differences between > > the 3.1.1 and 3.1.2-RC1 tags in git. > > Got it. I missed the -documentation part of the URL. > > Tested on Windows. Checksums confirmed. Signature matches, but Nick you > need to get yourself to a key signing party! :D > > > gpg: Good signature from "Nicolae Vatamaniuc <[email protected]>" > > [unknown] > > gpg: aka "default <[email protected]>" [unknown] > > gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! > > gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the > > owner. > > I have a repeatable error on make check: > > test/javascript/tests\replicator_db_bad_rep_id.js > Error: false > Trace back (most recent call first): > > 52:47: test/javascript/test_setup.js > T > 41:5: test/javascript/tests\replicator_db_bad_rep_id.js > rep_doc_with_bad_rep_id > 88:5: test/javascript/tests\replicator_db_bad_rep_id.js > couchTests.replicator_db_bad_rep_id > 50:5: test/javascript/cli_runner.js > runTest > 63:1: test/javascript/cli_runner.js > > However, because the JS test suite is finally all gone in 3.2/3.x, and > no one else is reporting this failure on Linux, and the new eunit tests > pass, AND because this part of the code didn't change, I'm going to > chalk it up to weirdness and ignore it. > > Windows package installed locally and verified functional thru the > Fauxton wizard: > > {"couchdb":"Welcome","version":"3.1.2","git_sha":"572b68e72","uuid":"c0a4fee320344dc32290b064608baceb","features":["access-ready","partitioned","pluggable-storage-engines","reshard","scheduler"],"vendor":{"name":"The > Apache Software Foundation"}} > > +1 > > > > > Regards, > > -Nick > > > > On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 8:36 PM Joan Touzet <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> Nick, that diff shows documentation only. Something seems wrong with > >> this release. > >> > >> Recommend we hold the vote until this can be cleared up? > >> > >> -Joan > >> > >> On 27/09/2021 08:53, Nick Vatamaniuc wrote: > >>> Dear community, > >>> > >>> I would like to propose that we release Apache CouchDB 3.1.2 > >>> > >>> Changes since 3.1.1 > >>> > >>> > >>> https://github.com/apache/couchdb-documentation/compare/3.1.1...3.1.x?expand=1 > >>> > >>> This is a minor release where we backport a few features from the > >>> pending 3.2 release to the 3.1.x branch. > >>> > >>> We encourage the whole community to download and test these release > >>> artefacts so that any critical issues can be resolved before the > >>> release is made. Everyone is free to vote on this release, so dig > >>> right in! (Only PMC members have binding votes, but they depend on > >>> community feedback to gauge if an official release is ready to be > >>> made.) > >>> > >>> The release artefacts we are voting on are available here: > >>> > >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/source/3.1.2/rc.1/ > >>> > >>> There, you will find a tarball, a GPG signature, and SHA256/SHA512 > >>> checksums. > >>> > >>> Please follow the test procedure here: > >>> > >>> > >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/COUCHDB/Testing+a+Source+Release > >>> > >>> Please remember that "RC1" is an annotation. If the vote passes, these > >>> artefacts will be released as Apache CouchDB 3.1.2 > >>> > >>> Please cast your votes. > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> -Nick > >>>
