patrickstuedi commented on a change in pull request #72: Allow namenode as
parameter instead of conf file.
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-crail/pull/72#discussion_r265110571
##########
File path: client/src/main/java/org/apache/crail/conf/CrailConfiguration.java
##########
@@ -39,6 +39,17 @@ public CrailConfiguration() throws IOException {
mergeProperties(properties);
}
+ // This constructor is useful, when a client does
+ // not have access to a file system, but only needs the configuration
+ // of the namenode address. As an example, an OpenWHisk function
+ // does not have a filesystem associated and therefore cannot
+ // read the namenode address from any configuration file.
+ public CrailConfiguration(String nameNodeAddress) throws IOException {
+ conf = new ConcurrentHashMap<>();
+ conf.put("crail.namenode.address", nameNodeAddress);
Review comment:
Anything is fine as long as we are not breaking existing applications and
benchmarks that assume the properties to be loaded when calling the empty
constructor.
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
With regards,
Apache Git Services
