+1 (non-binding) Using pure Maven and svn2pub or git2pub should be sufficient, and allowing GitHub-contributions to editing the website lowers the barriers for outsiders.
On 21 June 2016 at 11:38, Jochen Wiedmann <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to call for a vote on the subject. IMO (and others seem to > agree), we have no real advantage by using the CMS, which is suitable > for manually developed web sites, like www.apache,org, bu certainly > not for sites like ours, with big subtrees full of automatically > generated content. > > Thanks, > > Jochen > > > > -- > The next time you hear: "Don't reinvent the wheel!" > > http://www.keystonedevelopment.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/evolution-of-the-wheel-300x85.jpg -- Stian Soiland-Reyes Apache Taverna (incubating), Apache Commons http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718
