[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17805031#comment-17805031
]
Jochen Wiedmann commented on RAT-325:
-------------------------------------
Could we, please, have a clear distinction between the following two topics:
a) Identify the commit, which introduced the performance issue. That's what
"git bisect" is for, and nothing else.
b) As soon as we know that commit, look at the difference, develop ideas like
"due to SPDX scanning", or "Copyright checks" and thereby create the basis for
a fix.
My observation is, that we are constantly mixing these two steps above. And
that prevents me from doing my own analysis.
> Performance degradation compared to 0.15
> ----------------------------------------
>
> Key: RAT-325
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-325
> Project: Apache Rat
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: cli
> Affects Versions: 0.16
> Reporter: Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> Assignee: Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 0.17
>
>
> While testing 0.16-SNAPSHOT, I identified rat is much longer to execute than
> with 0.15.
> I'm investigating why.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
