I would have resigned the chair after a year anyway, so I have no problem with having that formalized. Good to spread the joy and the pain around. ;-)
J On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Patrick Hunt <[email protected]> wrote: > I'd suggest having a fixed term for the PMC chair. 1 year is good imo. > > Patrick > > On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 12:22 PM, Matthias Friedrich <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sunday, 2013-03-03, Gabriel Reid wrote: > >> On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 7:21 PM, Josh Wills <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 9:54 AM, Matthias Friedrich <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >>>> Nope, that seems to be it. I'm perfectly happy with the Zookeeper > >>>> model. I'd use it as a template and fine-tune it a bit: > > > >>>> I'd remove everything about sub-projects; the consensus at Apache > >>>> seems to be that we shouldn't have them. > > > >>>> I'm not sure if we need to do anything about code changes. I can live > >>>> with lazy approval - people are still likely to ask for feedback on > >>>> larger or potentially controversal changes. We're a small project, > >>>> no need to over-regulate things. > > > >>> +1 to all of the above. > > > >> +1 from me as well. > > > > Great. I'll leave this thread up for a few more days so others have > > a chance to comment. If no changes are requested I'll create a > > document that we can vote on. 2/3 majority seems appropriate. > > > > Regards, > > Matthias > -- Director of Data Science Cloudera <http://www.cloudera.com> Twitter: @josh_wills <http://twitter.com/josh_wills>
