Filed CRUNCH-244 and wrote a patch for this: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CRUNCH-244
Seems like this should be the last thing to go in before we start on the 0.7.0 release. J On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 2:47 PM, Matthias Friedrich <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks! MRunit is another example. It looks like we have to take > special care of the release assemblies, but other than that I don't > see anything out of the ordinary. > > Regards, > Matthias > > On Wednesday, 2013-07-24, Victor Iacoban wrote: > > Avro is doing this for avro-mapred, might use as a reference > > > > --victor > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Matthias Friedrich <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I don't think Maven allows you to create both hadoop1 and hadoop2 > > > artifacts from the same execution. And we obviously can't just rename > > > the built artifacts because the jars contain Maven metadata and the > > > POMs are signed. I've never needed to do this before but my guess is > > > that we have to configure the maven-jar-plugin to set the classifier > > > to hadoop1 or hadoop2 depending on the profile. > > > > > > We'll have to check whether we can run "mvn release:perform" twice > (once > > > for each profile) or if that requires some extra trickery. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Matthias > > > > > > [1] http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-jar-plugin/jar-mojo.html > > > > > > On Wednesday, 2013-07-24, Josh Wills wrote: > > > > We haven't really been in the habit of planning the releases-- my > sense > > > has > > > > been that we do a release when it feels like there's enough good > stuff in > > > > the snapshot to merit doing one, and I certainly feel like that's the > > > case > > > > now. > > > > > > > > My one question for the devs on the next release would be if (and > how) we > > > > should go about creating both hadoop1 and hadoop2-based binary > > > > releases/Maven artifacts. If anyone has strong feelings on it either > way, > > > > I'd like to hear them, along with a recommendations of the best way > to > > > > express it in the version for the release (e.g., 0.7.0-hadoop1 and > > > > 0.7.0-hadoop2? Or maybe use profiles in some way that I don't really > > > > understand?) > > > > > > > > J > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Micah Whitacre <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Is there a documented release plan for the upcoming 0.7 version of > > > Crunch? > > > > > Or an expected date? > > > > > > > > > > There are a few fixes that have been resolved (CRUNCH-217) > specifically > > > > > that I know would be useful to have released. > > > > > > > > > > Micah > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Director of Data Science > > > > Cloudera <http://www.cloudera.com> > > > > Twitter: @josh_wills <http://twitter.com/josh_wills> > > > > -- Director of Data Science Cloudera <http://www.cloudera.com> Twitter: @josh_wills <http://twitter.com/josh_wills>
