[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CRUNCH-438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14053187#comment-14053187
 ] 

Gabriel Reid commented on CRUNCH-438:
-------------------------------------

Agree with Josh on the coolness of this, I'm super-excited about this one.

Do we want to write these files on every run as in CRUNCH-418? I'm thinking 
that they're more of a planner debugging tool (although maybe I'm seeing that 
wrong), so maybe it would be better to just stick them in the Configuration 
object as is done with the end-plan dot file. I've got the feeling that it 
might be a bit confusing for someone who just wants to see what their actual 
job plan looks like to get four different options.

Also, one tiny nit: the RTNode#getEmiter method name should be getEmitter, 
although as far as I can see it's not used anywhere so it can probably just be 
dropped.



> Visualizations of some important internal/intermediate pipeline planning 
> states
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CRUNCH-438
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CRUNCH-438
>             Project: Crunch
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Core
>    Affects Versions: 0.10.0, 0.8.3
>            Reporter: Christian Tzolov
>            Assignee: Christian Tzolov
>         Attachments: CRUNCH-438.patch
>
>
> To improve the understability of the pipeline planning stages it would help 
> to visualize some intermediate planning states like:
> - PCollection lineage. (visualizing the output-pcollection-targets structure) 
> - MSCRPlanner's planning Graphs before and after the split up of dependent 
> GBK nodes
> - RTNode hierarchy along with the Input and Output configurations as 
> persistent in the Configuration before the execution of the pipeline. 
> Most of the information can be intercepted in the MSCRPlanner#plan()  method.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to