+1 Checked signatures, built and ran full integration test suite for both hadoop1 and hadoop2, all looks good.
Not having the binary release is fine by me. - Gabriel On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 6:11 PM, Matthias Friedrich <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Josh, > > never doubted you at any time :) > > +1 Source package builds and test cases work, licensing for the source > dist looks fine as do all the other things from the release validation > checklist. > > It looks like there are still some libs in the (now disabled) binary > distribution (algebird etc.) that aren't mentioned in LICENSE, so we > can't distribute the binary stuff until we get this sorted out. Sorry > for not spotting this in RC0. > > Thanks, > Matthias > > On Thursday, 2014-08-28, Josh Wills wrote: >> Hello, >> >> You didn't think a little thing like two failed release candidates would >> stop me, did you? >> >> No. Of course you didn't. >> >> This is a call for a vote on the third release candidate for Apache Crunch >> 0.11.0. This release contains fixes for the following issues: >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12327072&styleName=Html&projectId=12313526 >> >> The release artifacts are source-only this time; I think I got all of the >> binary license issues worked out, but better safe than sorry. If anyone >> objects, I can add the binary versions back in a pinch. >> http://people.apache.org/~jwills/crunch-0.11.0-RC2/ >> >> Maven staging repo(s): >> hadoop2: >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecrunch-1013 >> hadoop1: >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecrunch-1014 >> >> The tag to be voted upon: >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=crunch.git;a=tag;h=877089dd0dfeb5c0c84f712f416f5981c0fc51ee >> >> Crunch's KEYS file: >> http://www.apache.org/dist/crunch/KEYS >> >> Sincerely, >> Josh
