Well, it's in the annotation guidelines and the typesystem. Whether
there are any examples annotated like that I couldn't tell you. But
there does seem to be at least one conditional relation in the
stratified corpus, since it broke the code that reads the knowtator xml.
Tim
On 10/22/2013 11:06 AM, Dmitriy Dligach wrote:
Is polarity/uncertainty annotated for relations in the SHARP gold
standard?
Dima
On 10/22/2013 10:45 AM, Tim Miller wrote:
One more issue is with conditional attribute of relations. It is in
the sharp annotation guidelines I have access to but not in the
implemented typesystem nor in the typesystem documents I have. Should
there be a conditional field alongside polarity and uncertainty for
Relation?
Tim
On 10/21/2013 03:28 PM, Wu, Stephen T., Ph.D. wrote:
That's right.
BinaryTextRelations connect Annotations.
ElementRelations connect Elements.
In practice we have only ever used Annotations and BinaryTextRelations.
stephen
On 10/21/13 2:20 PM, "Tim Miller"
<timothy.mil...@childrens.harvard.edu>
wrote:
I'm not sure I understand the distinction between
BinaryTextRelation and
ElementRelation types. Is it the difference between the abstract
relation and a particular text instantiation?
On 10/17/2013 02:33 PM, Wu, Stephen T., Ph.D. wrote:
+1 creation of additional relation types, both BinaryTextRelation and
ElementRelation.
stephen
On 10/17/13 12:20 PM, "Tim Miller"
<timothy.mil...@childrens.harvard.edu>
wrote:
I noticed yesterday that the ctakes type system is missing some
of the
types from the SHARP annotations. This causes an error when we
try to
read in data with those types with our reader. I created a JIRA
for the
issue here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CTAKES-250
Any thoughts on whether I should just implement them or is there
some
reason to have a more detailed discussion?
--
Tim Miller, PhD
Postdoctoral Research Fellow
Children's Hospital Informatics Program
Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School
617-919-1223
