Tim, thank you very much for working on this upgrade. I know it was a pretty serious effort.
Question: were there any particular changes in uimafit/cleartk that we should be aware of? Any major deviation from the way we typically used uimafit/cleartk? Dima On Sep 16, 2014, at 15:02, Miller, Timothy <[email protected]> wrote: > This mega-revision is now checked in. Jenkins will let me know if there > are any major issues with compiling, but please feedback to the list if > there is anything more subtle that was a mistake and we can try to work > through it. > > Thanks > Tim > > On 09/11/2014 03:41 PM, Miller, Timothy wrote: >> Just wanted to send a heads up to the list/community that I am working >> on upgrading ctakes to use most recent versions of Uimafit (2.1) and >> Cleartk (2.0). This will allow us to keep up with namespace changes in >> uimafit and new machine learning methods being used in cleartk (that we >> are also contributing to). However, this will entail a lot of small >> changes across the codebase, so I thought it would be good to give a bit >> of a warning. Specifically if anyone else has any large unchecked-in >> changes to the code svn may throw some conflicts at you. >> >> Tim >> >
