Yup, JIRA would be great, thanks tomasz.... maybe even a unit test to reproduce this?
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 12:16 PM, Chen, Pei <pei.c...@childrens.harvard.edu> wrote: > Tomasz, > Thanks for bringing those up. It would be great if you can log the real > examples into the Jira ticket and it can be incorporated into test cases > going forward (it may most likely need more training examples). > Also, FYI- If I recall correctly, there was nothing previously in cTAKES > that explicitly populated the subject attribute. The closest remotely was > the regex that was lumped together with history. > > I hope that helps... > --Pei > -----Original Message----- > From: Tomasz Oliwa [mailto:ol...@uchicago.edu] > Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2015 11:35 AM > To: dev@ctakes.apache.org > Subject: RE: UmlsConcept subject > > Pei, > > The SubjectCleartkAnalysisEngine is currently broken in cTAKES, I tried it > with more examples, it just returns "patient" as subject. > > You mentioned that this is the new Subject Classifier. > > 1. What was the old module that was capturing the subject of a UmlsConcept? > > 2. How can this old module be enabled in the clinical pipeline until this > new Subject Classifier is fixed? > > Thanks, > Tomasz > -- jay vyas
