Hi Erin,

I would expect the relation annotator to catch contains(for 4 years, sinusitis) 
but clearly it’s far from perfect.

I am surprised it catches contains(4 years ago, *city*) but this is mostly 
because *city* is marked as an event (not sure why). 

Dima



> On May 11, 2017, at 12:00, Erin Gustafson <erin.gustaf...@northwestern.edu> 
> wrote:
> 
> Hey Dima,
> 
> Yes, that is one solution! Perhaps that's just the best way to go.
> 
> I'm seeing right now that the annotator is missing some relations that I 
> would expect it to catch (unless I'm misunderstanding something, which is 
> possible). For example:
> 
> He reports sinusitis and rhinitis for 4 years, which started when he moved to 
> *city* 4 years ago.
> -> misses sinusitis for 4 years, rhinitis for 4 years
> -> catches *city* 4 years ago
> 
> Would you expect those sort of expressions to be captured by the temporal 
> module?
> 
> Thanks,
> Erin
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dligach, Dmitriy [mailto:ddlig...@luc.edu] 
> Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2017 11:50 AM
> To: dev@ctakes.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Temporal module dictionary
> 
> Hi Erin,
> 
> Is it an option to use all events and then just post-process the output of 
> temporal relation extraction to include the events you are interested in? The 
> temporal module may break if you exclude some events.
> 
> Dima
> 
> 
> 
>> On May 11, 2017, at 11:44, Erin Gustafson <erin.gustaf...@northwestern.edu> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> I would like to use the temporal module to detect temporal relations 
>> involving events specific to a phenotype. I've created a custom .bsv 
>> dictionary with a limited set of concepts relevant to that phenotype, which 
>> I have used in the past as input to the dictionary look-up algorithm. Now 
>> I'd like to try to use the same dictionary with the temporal module to limit 
>> the extracted relations to those involving events of interest.
>> 
>> Is it possible to do this? I've plugged my dictionary in to 
>> FullTemporalExtractionPipeline, but the detected events still include 
>> concepts that fall outside my dictionary.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Erin
> 

Reply via email to