@Sean,
is it not a license obligation to validate umls credentials on every load
of the pipeline ?

I have offline umls data on elasticsearch and a customized concept
extractor . But I still stayed true to the interface of
umlsdictionarylookupannotator and validated the credentials of umls as data
was dumped from umls.

Regards,
Devi

On 14-Feb-2018 21:42, "Finan, Sean" <sean.fi...@childrens.harvard.edu>
wrote:

> Hi Gandhi, all,
>
> JdbcDictionary and JdbcConceptFactory are probably the way to go.  Just to
> add, you don't need to load the dictionary into another database (mysql) to
> use Jdbc* classes.  They will work out-of-box with the default dictionary.
>
> Sean
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gandhi Rajan Natarajan [mailto:gandhi.natara...@arisglobal.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2018 11:08 AM
> To: dev@ctakes.apache.org
> Subject: RE: using umls dictionary lookup offline [EXTERNAL]
>
> Hi Razu,
>
> You can load the UMLS data in database like MySQL and use
> JdbcConceptFactory instead of UmlsJdbcConceptFactory.
>
> Regards,
> Gandhi
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Razu Sharif [mailto:razu.cse10.r...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2018 2:53 PM
> To: dev@ctakes.apache.org
> Subject: using umls dictionary lookup offline
>
> Dear,
>
> Every time I run cTakes it calls out internet to check our credentials.
> Whats required to make it work without internet or credential check.
>
> Thanks
> Razu Sharif
> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
> solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
> If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute
> or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender or system manager by email
> immediately if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this
> e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are
> notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in
> reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and
> against the law.
>

Reply via email to