[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CURATOR-164?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14505804#comment-14505804
]
Jordan Zimmerman commented on CURATOR-164:
------------------------------------------
It's no so much removing the sync as I'm not convinced that the ServiceInstance
is a good sync target. It changes over time. For example, look at how watched
instances are handled. Also, independently, while looking at the code I
realized the separate watchers map doesn't make sense. Consolidating everything
into a single "holder" solves a lot of problems. Once that was done, the sync
became unnecessary.
> curator-x-discovery: unregisterService is not guaranteed to remove the
> service, due to reconnectListener concurrency issue
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CURATOR-164
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CURATOR-164
> Project: Apache Curator
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Framework
> Affects Versions: 2.7.0
> Reporter: Rasmus Berg Palm
> Assignee: Jordan Zimmerman
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 2.8.0
>
>
> In ServiceDiscoveryImpl:
> When unregistering a service, the reconnect listener might fire while
> deleting the path.
> This can cause a condition where the delete finishes successfully, the
> service is removed from services, and then the reRegisterServices completes
> successfully and the service is added back in ZK and in services, end result
> being that the service was not removed, even though unregisterService did not
> throw any exceptions.
> Essentially the use of the internal 'services' cache makes for a nightmare of
> concurrency issues. I put this as critical as the library it's really not
> usable IMO.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
