Github user Randgalt commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/curator/pull/93#discussion_r35292418
--- Diff:
curator-recipes/src/main/java/org/apache/curator/framework/recipes/nodes/PersistentEphemeralNode.java
---
@@ -233,8 +236,15 @@ else if ( event.getResultCode() ==
KeeperException.Code.OK.intValue() )
{
path = event.getName();
}
+ else if ( event.getResultCode() ==
KeeperException.Code.NOAUTH.intValue() )
+ {
+ log.warn("Client does not have authorisation to write
ephemeral node at path {}", path);
--- End diff --
Sorry to be pedantic. But, isn't this going to be the same issue for
InterProcessMutex, etc.? i.e. any ZK recipe that creates nodes - which is a lot
of them. I think it's a mistake to have specific handling like this in a single
recipe.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
