[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CURATOR-233?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14710088#comment-14710088 ]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on CURATOR-233: ---------------------------------------- GitHub user madrob opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/curator/pull/99 CURATOR-233 Fix DistributedDoubleBarrier::leave DDB::leave would not respect the wait time parameters correctly, and would sometimes return true, even though not all clients had left the barrier. You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/madrob/curator CURATOR-233 Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at: https://github.com/apache/curator/pull/99.patch To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch with (at least) the following in the commit message: This closes #99 ---- commit 699cefd8e0a26a298774a2688e16f5ec54599408 Author: Mike Drob <md...@apache.org> Date: 2015-08-24T14:27:03Z CURATOR-233 Fix DistributedDoubleBarrier::leave DDB::leave would not respect the wait time parameters correctly, and would sometimes return true, even though not all clients had left the barrier. ---- > Bug in double barrier > --------------------- > > Key: CURATOR-233 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CURATOR-233 > Project: Apache Curator > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Recipes > Affects Versions: 2.8.0 > Reporter: J D > Assignee: Mike Drob > Fix For: awaiting-response > > Attachments: DoubleBarrierClient.java, DoubleBarrierTester.java > > > Hi, > I think I discovered a bug in the internalLeave method of the double barrier > implementation. > When a client is told to leave the barrier after maxWait it does not do so. A > flag is set but the client does not leave the barrier, instead it keeps > iterating through the control loop and drives CPU usage to 100%. > I have attached an example. > Best regards > Lianro -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)