*gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!gpg:
There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner.*
This is just gpg being gpg. So long as you're seeing "Good Signature" Mike
is doing it correctly.
You can manually force the key to be be trusted if you want. Something
like "gpg --edit-key EF362B9E trust"
On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Jordan Zimmerman <jor...@jordanzimmerman.com
> wrote:
> Yeah, I imported http://www.apache.org/dist/curator/KEYS
>
>
>
> On September 2, 2015 at 2:12:01 PM, Mike Drob (md...@apache.org) wrote:
>
> Yes. Did you import it?
>
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2015, 4:07 PM Jordan Zimmerman <jor...@jordanzimmerman.com>
> wrote:
>
> > gpg: Signature made Wed Sep 2 10:59:33 2015 PDT using RSA key ID EF362B9E
> >
> > gpg: Good signature from "Mike Drob (CODE SIGNING KEY) <md...@apache.org
> >"
> > [unknown]
> >
> > gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
> >
> > gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the
> > owner.
> >
> > Primary key fingerprint: 86ED B9C3 3B85 1722 8E88 A8F9 3E48 C0C6 EF36
> 2B9E
> >
> > Mike - did you publish your key?
> >
> > -JZ
> >
> >
> >
> > On September 2, 2015 at 11:10:52 AM, Mike Drob (md...@apache.org) wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > This is the vote for Apache Curator version 2.9.0
> >
> > *** Please download, test and vote within approx. 72 hours
> >
> > Note that we are voting upon the source (tag) and binaries are
> > provided for convenience.
> >
> > Link to release
> > notes:
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314425&version=12326663
> >
> > Staging repo:https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/curator/2.9.0/
> >
> > Binary artifacts:
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecurator-1015
> > The tag to be voted
> > upon:
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=curator.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/apache-curator-2.9.0-rc1
> >
> > Curator's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the
> > release:http://www.apache.org/dist/curator/KEYS
> >
> > [ ] +1 approve
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> >
> >
>
