+1

Verified signatures and checksums.
Verified compatibility with 2.9.0 release.

Contents of zip file have 777 permissions, which probably isn't a huge
issue but is mildly annoying/surprising. Cam, are you building on Windows,
by chance?

On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Jordan Zimmerman <
jor...@jordanzimmerman.com> wrote:

> No. We need 3 +1s for a vote to succeed.
>
> > On Oct 29, 2015, at 12:47 PM, Scott Blum <dragonsi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Oh sorry, I thought by voting +0 I was helping form the quorum. :(
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 1:11 PM, Jordan Zimmerman <
> jor...@jordanzimmerman.com <mailto:jor...@jordanzimmerman.com>> wrote:
> > In that case maybe you can reconsider and give a +1? We’re having
> trouble getting quorum votes these days.
> >
> > -JZ
> >
> >> On Oct 29, 2015, at 12:05 PM, Scott Blum <dragonsi...@gmail.com
> <mailto:dragonsi...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >>
> >> No concerns!  Just slammed right now with work so I'm not able to
> really evaluate. I trust you all.
> >>
> >> On Oct 29, 2015 8:42 AM, "Jordan Zimmerman" <jor...@jordanzimmerman.com
> <mailto:jor...@jordanzimmerman.com>> wrote:
> >> Any reason why +0? Do you have some concerns?
> >>
> >> -JZ
> >>
> >> > On Oct 29, 2015, at 12:40 AM, Scott Blum <dragonsi...@gmail.com
> <mailto:dragonsi...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > +0 no opinion, binding
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 6:00 PM, Cameron McKenzie <
> mckenzie....@gmail.com <mailto:mckenzie....@gmail.com>>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Bump, can some other committers please cast a vote.
> >> >> cheers
> >> >>
> >> >> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 6:21 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <
> >> >> jor...@jordanzimmerman.com <mailto:jor...@jordanzimmerman.com>>
> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>> signature is valid.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> +1 binding
> >> >>>
> >> >>>> On Oct 26, 2015, at 2:10 PM, Cameron McKenzie <
> cammcken...@apache.org <mailto:cammcken...@apache.org>>
> >> >>> wrote:
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Hello,
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> This is the vote for Apache Curator version 2.9.1
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> *** Please download, test and vote within approx. 72 hours
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Note that we are voting upon the source (tag) and binaries are
> >> >>>> provided for convenience.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Link to release notes:
> >> >>>> *
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314425&version=12333324
> <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314425&version=12333324
> >
> >> >>>> <
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314425&version=12333324
> <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314425&version=12333324
> >
> >> >>>> *
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Staging repo:
> >> >>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/curator/2.9.1/ <
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/curator/2.9.1/>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Binary artifacts:
> >> >>>> *
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecurator-1019/
> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecurator-1019/
> >
> >> >>>> <
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecurator-1019/
> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecurator-1019/
> >
> >> >>>> *
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> The tag to be voted upon:
> >> >>>> *
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=curator.git;a=tag;h=9ba74139e35fd6213e480d826a7de812e6b109b8
> <
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=curator.git;a=tag;h=9ba74139e35fd6213e480d826a7de812e6b109b8
> >
> >> >>>> <
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=curator.git;a=tag;h=9ba74139e35fd6213e480d826a7de812e6b109b8
> <
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=curator.git;a=tag;h=9ba74139e35fd6213e480d826a7de812e6b109b8
> >
> >> >>>> *
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Curator's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
> >> >>>> http://www.apache.org/dist/curator/KEYS <
> http://www.apache.org/dist/curator/KEYS>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> [ ] +1  approve
> >> >>>> [ ] +0  no opinion
> >> >>>> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>

Reply via email to