I’d really like to do a simultaneous release. So, I’ll cancel this release.
-Jordan > On Feb 9, 2016, at 11:51 AM, Scott Blum <[email protected]> wrote: > > Actually let me clarify.. > > +1 on 2.10.0 > -1 on 3.1.0 > > On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 11:50 AM, Scott Blum <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > Going to -1 until we track down the TestTreeCache failures (today). Also, > floated a potential issue with NamespaceWatcher under separate subject. > > On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 5:45 AM, Scott Blum <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > Let me take a look tomorrow. I had no idea they were failing on 3.0. Maybe > this was known-failures masking unknown-failures. > > On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 10:43 PM, Jordan Zimmerman <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > Should we cancel the release? Scott? > > > On Feb 8, 2016, at 10:21 PM, Cameron McKenzie <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > +1 > > > > The tree cache tests still seem to be failing for me on the 3.0 branch > > though. > > > > On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Cameron McKenzie <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> > > wrote: > > > >> OK, let me rerun the tests. I think that making the tests more reliable > >> would definitely be a good thing. I'm happy to have a look into this also. > >> cheers > >> > >> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 10:32 AM, Jordan Zimmerman < > >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >> > >>> Many tests are flakey and fail/pass. I have plans to address this in the > >>> future. But, I don’t think it should hold the release as it’s been the > >>> case > >>> for a long time. But, I’m OK with whatever the group decides. > >>> > >>> -JZ > >>> > >>>> On Feb 8, 2016, at 6:25 PM, Cameron McKenzie <[email protected] > >>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> > >>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Keys verify OK. > >>>> > >>>> 2.10.0: > >>>> > >>>> TestBoundedDistributedQueue.testMulti failed on the first run, but > >>> passed > >>>> subsequently, so I guess this is ok. > >>>> > >>>> 3.1.0: > >>>> > >>>> Failed tests: > >>>> > >>> org.apache.curator.framework.recipes.cache.TestTreeCache.testDeleteNodeAfterCloseDoesntCallExecutor(org.apache.curator.framework.recipes.cache.TestTreeCache) > >>>> Run 1: > >>>> > >>> TestTreeCache.testDeleteNodeAfterCloseDoesntCallExecutor:533->BaseTestTreeCache.assertEvent:158->BaseTestTreeCache.assertEvent:170 > >>>> TreeCacheEvent{type=INITIALIZED, data=null} expected [NODE_ADDED] but > >>> found > >>>> [INITIALIZED] > >>>> Run 2: > >>>> > >>> TestTreeCache.testDeleteNodeAfterCloseDoesntCallExecutor:537->BaseTestTreeCache.assertEvent:158->BaseTestTreeCache.assertEvent:178 > >>>> TreeCacheEvent{type=NODE_ADDED, data=ChildData{path='/test', > >>>> stat=2,2,1454970465429,1454970465429,0,0,0,0,9,0,2 > >>>> , data=[49, 50, 55, 46, 48, 46, 49, 46, 49]}} expected [/test/one] but > >>>> found [/test] > >>>> > >>>> > >>> org.apache.curator.framework.recipes.cache.TestTreeCache.testDeleteThenCreate(org.apache.curator.framework.recipes.cache.TestTreeCache) > >>>> Run 1: > >>>> > >>> TestTreeCache.testDeleteThenCreate:371->BaseTestTreeCache.assertEvent:158->BaseTestTreeCache.assertEvent:170 > >>>> TreeCacheEvent{type=INITIALIZED, data=null} expected [NODE_ADDED] but > >>> found > >>>> [INITIALIZED] > >>>> Run 2: PASS > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 6:00 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <[email protected] > >>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Hello, > >>>>> > >>>>> This is a combined vote to release Apache Curator versions 2.10.0 and > >>> 3.1.0 > >>>>> > >>>>> *** Please download, test and vote within approx. 72 hours > >>>>> > >>>>> Note that we are voting upon the source (tag) and binaries are > >>>>> provided for convenience. > >>>>> > >>>>> Link to release notes: > >>>>> 2.1.10 - > >>>>> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314425&version=12333942 > >>> > >>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314425&version=12333942> > >>>>> 3.1.0 - > >>>>> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314425&version=12333884 > >>> > >>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314425&version=12333884> > >>>>> > >>>>> Staging repos: > >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/curator/2.10.0/ > >>>>> <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/curator/2.10.0/> > >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/curator/3.1.0/ > >>>>> <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/curator/3.1.0/> > >>>>> > >>>>> Binary artifacts: > >>>>> 2.1.10 - > >>>>> > >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecurator-1020 > >>> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecurator-1020> > >>>>> 3.1.0 - > >>>>> > >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecurator-1021 > >>> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecurator-1021> > >>>>> > >>>>> The tags to be voted upon: > >>>>> 2.10.0 - > >>>>> > >>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=curator.git;a=tag;h=eaaba2fe96a964654631ed4248315f83ea677521 > >>> > >>> <https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=curator.git;a=tag;h=eaaba2fe96a964654631ed4248315f83ea677521> > >>>>> 3.1.0 - > >>>>> > >>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=curator.git;a=tag;h=2cd4babca1720cd3acb501d76d5c2fad90aaf2c9 > >>> > >>> <https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=curator.git;a=tag;h=2cd4babca1720cd3acb501d76d5c2fad90aaf2c9> > >>>>> > >>>>> Curator's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release: > >>>>> http://www.apache.org/dist/curator/KEYS > >>>>> <http://www.apache.org/dist/curator/KEYS> > >>>>> > >>>>> [ ] +1 approve > >>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion > >>>>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > >>>>> > >>> > >>> > >> > > > >
