All 2.10.0 tests pass 3.1 is a bit flaky, but pass eventually. +1 to both (binding)
cheers On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 5:21 AM, Mike Drob <[email protected]> wrote: > All 2.10 tests pass. > Most 3.1 tests pass, the ones that didn't pass did so when rerun in > isolation. > Signatures match zip file > Zip file matches source tag > Licence headers look good. > Compatibility reports look good. > > +1 to both (binding) > > On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 10:52 AM, David Kesler <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Gotcha. Thanks for the explanation. Figured it's better to be safe than > > sorry. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jordan Zimmerman [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2016 11:40 AM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Curator version 2.10.0 and 3.1.0, RC2 > > > > ZK 3.5 has an odd version numbering scheme. I’ve complained to them. > > "3.5.1-alpha” is not really an alpha. Lots of people are using it in > > Production. The ZK team wants to communicate that it should be used with > > caution. There will never be a non-alpha 3.5.1. The next version will be > > 3.5.2-alpha, etc. until they’re comfortable to remove the “alpha” tag. > > > > -JZ > > > > > On Feb 11, 2016, at 11:36 AM, David Kesler <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > *Nonbinding* > > > 2.10.0: +1. I tested against our internal libraries that use ZK and > > spot-checked a few types of our applications and everything looked fine. > > > > > > I can't check 3.1.0 since I have issues even running with 3.0.0 and > > haven't had time to look into upgrading our stuff to be compatible with > > it. While trying to test it, I did notice that 3.1.0 is pulling in an > > alpha build of zookeeper (3.5.1-alpha) which seemed kind of odd. Not > sure > > if it's intentional or not, but I thought I'd bring it up. > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Jordan Zimmerman [mailto:[email protected]] > > > Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2016 3:30 PM > > > To: [email protected] > > > Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Curator version 2.10.0 and 3.1.0, RC2 > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > This is a combined vote to release Apache Curator versions 2.10.0 and > > 3.1.0, RC2 > > > > > > *** Please download, test and vote within approx. 72 hours > > > > > > Note that we are voting upon the source (tag) and binaries are provided > > for convenience. > > > > > > Link to release notes: > > > 2.1.10 - > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314425&version=12333942 > > > 3.1.0 - > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314425&version=12333884 > > > > > > Staging repos: > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/curator/2.10.0/ > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/curator/3.1.0/ > > > > > > Binary artifacts: > > > 2.1.10 - > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecurator-1023 > > > 3.1.0 - > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecurator-1022 > > > > > > The tags to be voted upon: > > > 2.10.0 - > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=curator.git;a=tag;h=d7bc24a6e82490a42c87e7ecd14efb209a8f1e66 > > > 3.1.0 - > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=curator.git;a=tag;h=a5d3edab7fb290a00cb6ad579671396ca9c1f831 > > > > > > Curator's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release: > > > http://www.apache.org/dist/curator/KEYS > > > > > > [ ] +1 approve > > > [ ] +0 no opinion > > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > > > >
