Yep, I will try and do it tomorrow On 13 Jun 2016 1:19 PM, "Jordan Zimmerman" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Sure - you OK doing it? > > > On Jun 12, 2016, at 10:09 PM, Cameron McKenzie <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > It could probably just be the remaining amount of time until session > > timeout couldn't it? We should know at what time the last event was as we > > use this to calculate when the list event occurs > > On 13 Jun 2016 12:54 PM, "Jordan Zimmerman" <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> Yeah - that was my thinking but, really, it could be done more often. > >> Maybe 1/3 instead of 2/3? It wouldn’t do any harm really. Just as long > as > >> it doesn’t turn into a spin loop. > >> > >> -Jordan > >> > >>> On Jun 7, 2016, at 2:13 AM, Cameron McKenzie <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> Jordan, do you remember what the rationale behind only waiting for 2/3 > of > >>> the session timeout is? It's something to do with the way that ZK > itself > >>> handles session timeouts isn't it? Does ZK timeout the session if it > >> hasn't > >>> received a heartbeat for 2/3 of the session timeout? I can't remember. > >>> cheers > >> > >> > >
