GitHub user njhill opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/curator/pull/250

    [CURATOR-447] TreeCache: Improve memory usage and thread safety

    Jira https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CURATOR-374 reduced per-node 
memory usage in `TreeCache`. It can be improved further via removal of the 
`nodeState` field - its `LIVE` state corresponds exactly to the adjacent 
`childData` field being non-null, and a sentinel `ChildData` value can be used 
for the `DEAD` state. This simplification also reduces the room for bugs and 
state inconsistencies.
    
    Other improvements included:
    * A further simplification to have `TreeNode` extend `AtomicReference`, 
which obviates the need for an explicit `childData` field
    * More robust cache update logic (in get-children and get-data event 
callbacks)
    * Avoid overhead of incrementing/decrementing the `outstandingOps` atomic 
integer post-initialization
    
    See corresponding JIRA: 
[CURATOR-447](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CURATOR-447)

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/njhill/curator CURATOR-447

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/curator/pull/250.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #250
    
----
commit 1c7be856fb514015286855f1ad9fd89069c32906
Author: nickhill <nickhill@...>
Date:   2017-03-26T20:19:40Z

    remove nodeState field, improve thread safety of cache updates
    
    also simplify by having TreeNode extend AtomicReference<ChildData>

commit 67210556919d7f822c431597245c4fa7246901dd
Author: nickhill <nickhill@...>
Date:   2017-03-26T20:20:32Z

    avoid incrementing/decrementing outstandingOps post-initialization
    
    no need to incur the synchronization overhead

commit a5a680d50e50a0a804caa875a53e2ee8d9a268f9
Author: nickhill <nickhill@...>
Date:   2018-01-02T16:36:20Z

    remove superfluous braces

----


---

Reply via email to