Yuri Tceretian created CURATOR-504:
--------------------------------------

             Summary: Race conditions in LeaderLatch after reconnecting to 
ensemble
                 Key: CURATOR-504
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CURATOR-504
             Project: Apache Curator
          Issue Type: Bug
    Affects Versions: 4.1.0
            Reporter: Yuri Tceretian
            Assignee: Jordan Zimmerman
         Attachments: 51868597-65791000-231c-11e9-9bfa-1def62bc3ea1.png

We use LeaderLatch in a lot of places in our system and when ZooKeeper ensemble 
is unstable and clients are reconnecting to logs are full of messages like the 
following:

{{
[2017-08-31 
19:18:34,562][ERROR][org.apache.curator.framework.recipes.leader.LeaderLatch] 
Can't find our node. Resetting. Index: -1 {}
}}

According to the implementation, this can happen in two cases:

https://github.com/apache/curator/blob/4251fe328908e5fca37af034fabc190aa452c73f/curator-recipes/src/main/java/org/apache/curator/framework/recipes/leader/LeaderLatch.java#L529-L536

* When internal state `ourPath` is null 
* When the list of latches does not have the expected one.

I believe we hit the first condition because of races that occur after client 
reconnects to ZooKeeper.
* Client reconnects to ZooKeeper and LeaderLatch gets the event and calls reset 
method which set the internal state (`ourPath`) to null, removes old latch and 
creates a new one. This happens in thread "Curator-ConnectionStateManager-0". 
* Almost simultaneously, LeaderLatch gets another even NodeDeleted 
([here|https://github.com/apache/curator/blob/4251fe328908e5fca37af034fabc190aa452c73f/curator-recipes/src/main/java/org/apache/curator/framework/recipes/leader/LeaderLatch.java#L543-L554])
 and tries to re-read the list of latches and check leadership. This happens in 
the thread "main-EventThread".

Therefore, sometimes there is a situation when method `checkLeadership` is 
called when `ourPath` is null. 






--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to