Also, FYI - I've answered a load of Curator questions on SO: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/apache-curator <https://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/apache-curator> - not too many this year though.
-Jordan > On Dec 1, 2020, at 11:40 AM, Enrico Olivelli <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thank you all, > In my experience Curator is very much used in the ZooKeeper ecosystem. > Probably many people have Apache Curator in their stack and they even do > not know. > I am currently trying to upgrade ZK to the latest version (3.6.x) in a few > projects (in Apache BookKeeper and Pulsar for instance) and always I get > into Curator that is to be upgraded. > > I see people using it for the recipes and also a very good value is > perceived for the TestingServer, because it makes it super easy to start > the ZK server for tests. > > Probably we should try to find a way to get more feedback from our users > as already said in this thread, ZooKeeper is very stable and Curator > follows this line, > this is why we do not have much activity on the ML. > > Enrico > > Il giorno mer 25 nov 2020 alle ore 00:58 Jordan Zimmerman < > [email protected]> ha scritto: > >> I appreciate that positive perspective. Thank you. >> >> -Jordan >> >>> On Nov 24, 2020, at 6:23 PM, Tamas Penzes <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> I think Curator has the same problem as ZooKeeper: it works well, not too >>> many things to do. (Even when I see more activity recently on ZooKeeper.) >>> >>> This is why we don't see too much activity on the mailing lists and also >>> from committers. Why to change something that works? >>> Pace of releases looks good to me, as Curator mostly follows ZooKeeper >>> releases. That looks to be a good option. >>> The big question is if Curator needs a new release for a new ZooKeeper >>> release or not, because then Curator might have even less releases in the >>> future. >>> >>> I personally wanted to do more things after the jUnit5 migration, but am >>> quite busy right now and I'm only working on ZooKeeper or Curator as a >>> hobby project to release stress. >>> (I should do more. ;-)) >>> >>> On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 10:05 PM Cameron McKenzie < >> [email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Agreed with all your points Jordan, >>>> While my employer is still using Curator, I'm no longer actively >> involved >>>> in the project. >>>> cheers >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 6:03 AM Jordan Zimmerman < >>>> [email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>>> 1) Mailing lists >>>>> >>>>> Not much activity. There used to be more questions/comments. I've sent >>>>> several emails with questions/ideas in the past year that have gotten >> no >>>>> response at all other than from other committers. >>>>> >>>>>> 2) Recent activity from committers >>>>> >>>>> We have a good group of committers. But, none of us are using Curator >> in >>>>> their day jobs anymore. Has Curator gone into retirement? I know there >>>> are >>>>> company's using it but they don't tend to take any role in the project. >>>>> >>>>>> 3) Recent activity from new contributors >>>>> >>>>> We tend to get bug reports and then the reporters wait for solutions. >> Or >>>>> we get PRs that are hard to review or unclear. That said, there have >> been >>>>> some good submissions as well. >>>>> >>>>>> 4) Pace of the releases >>>>> >>>>> We had a good spell moving to 5.0.0 but things have nearly stopped now. >>>>> >>>>> -JZ >>>>> >>>>>> On Nov 24, 2020, at 11:38 AM, Enrico Olivelli <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hello folks, >>>>>> I would like to take a little survey and check the current state of >> the >>>>>> project. >>>>>> >>>>>> Can you please share your thoughts about these points ? >>>>>> >>>>>> 1) Mailing lists >>>>>> 2) Recent activity from committers >>>>>> 3) Recent activity from new contributors >>>>>> 4) Pace of the releases >>>>>> >>>>>> Feel free to add any point to the list. >>>>>> >>>>>> Best regards >>>>>> Enrico >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >> >>
