[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CURATOR-660?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17700447#comment-17700447
]
Zili Chen commented on CURATOR-660:
-----------------------------------
[~tamaas] [~andor] [~dora.horvath] Many projects have such scripts or
integrations, but few contributors/reviewers really take it into account when
deciding whether or not to merge a patch.
See https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/1905 sonatype-lift complains a lot
but we don't care about.
See more on https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pulls codecov comments on every
PR, but no contributor or reviewer care about the report.
However, adding such scripts do no harm, so I can merge the patch and see if
the situation is different to Curator. Also, the origin patch isn't integrated
into an automation workflow so I doubt more about its benefit.
> Enable code coverage reporting to SonarQube
> -------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CURATOR-660
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CURATOR-660
> Project: Apache Curator
> Issue Type: Task
> Reporter: Dóra Horváth
> Assignee: Zili Chen
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: pull-request-available
> Time Spent: 10m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Enable coverage report generation and publishing to SonarQube.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
