I'm trying to dig into CXF-1547 to try and get the "proper" fix in
place. Basically, I'm trying to make sure all the
InterceptorProviders are properly examined and in a consistent
order. We basically have 5 interceptor providers:
Endpoint
Binding
Service
Bus
Client (client side only)
On the server side, they are evaluated in this order:
In: bus, endpoint, binding, service
Out: endpoint, service, bus, binding
Fault: endpoint, binding, service, bus
On the client side:
In: bus, endpoint, client, binding
Out: bus, endpoint, client, binding
Fault: endpoint, binding, service, bus
Things to note:
Client side doesn't look at the Service at all except for faults. We
definitely need to fix that.
Server side uses different ordering for all three chains.
I'd like to make this completely consistent. I want to make it:
Server: bus, binding, endpoint, service
Client: bus, binding, endpoint, service, client
Or:
Server: bus, service, endpoint, binding
Client: bus, client, service, endpoint, binding
Any opinions or objections? Looking through things, I'm leaning
toward the second option. It LOOKS like the binding seems to define
the most "addAfter" interceptors which cause more work when building
the InterceptorChain if they are already in the chain. Thus, putting
them at the end may perform the best. I may run some checks to make
sure though.
In anycase, any thoughts?
---
Daniel Kulp
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.dankulp.com/blog
