Most likely, in those cases, we would be calling writeDocument with
the writePrologue falg set to false as it would be encapsulated in a
soap message or something that would have already written that.
Most likely, if prologue writing is turned off, we DON'T want to write
any PI's either as they would be invalid. Thus, my suggestion would
be to use the old behavior if false and your new code if true.
Dan
On Jul 24, 2008, at 7:06 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
Have fun. But I don't think PI's are part of the WSDL document--
they are
external to it, however I'm seeing some open source products that
provide
stylesheets for WSDLs, so it may not be that big a deal.
At any rate, make sure your change does not result in SOAP messages
being
allowed to have PI's--that remains a no-no (3rd paragraph of
http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/REC-soap12-part1-20030624/#soapenv, and
also the
WS-I Basic Profile).
Well, I suppose that I've just made it hypothetically possible for a
user of CXF to sneak a PI out on the wire, assuming that we have any
code path where the user gives us a DOM tree and we pass it along.
It's presumably arguable whether it is up to us to step on such
things.
Does anyone know of such a code path?
---
Daniel Kulp
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.dankulp.com/blog
