In fact, I can probably update JSON provider to do it. If it is set to operate in 'unwrapped' mode then it will append a class name to the stream, will do it shortly
cheers, Sergey Sergey Beryozkin wrote: > > Hi > > I'm not sure yet - it appears JSONProvider may need to be updated to > handle unwrapped cases. > Does anyone know, is it already possible to do somehow in CXF ? > > Perhaps one workaround is to register a RequestFilter which will replace > an InputStream on the inbound message with another stream which will > present > > {"name":"abc"} > > as > > {"employee":{"name":"abc"}} > > for small streams (JSON ones are probably all quite small) this should > work quite well. what do you think ? > > cheers, Sergey > > > > Chaitanya-10 wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I have a JAX-RS method which takes an Employee object as a param. >> Employee class is given below. >> >> @XmlRootElement >> public class Employee { >> private String name; >> >> public String getName() { >> return name; >> } >> >> public void setName(String name) { >> this.name = name; >> } >> } >> >> Unmarshalling of the JSON >> >> {"employee":{"name":"abc"}} >> >> works fine and gives an Employee object, but if the JSON input is >> >> {"name":"abc"} >> >> unmarshalling fails. >> >> Does CXF support both wrapped and unwrapped styles in Mapped convention >> for JSON? >> If yes what should be done to make the second case work? >> >> Thank you >> Chaithanya. >> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Supprot-for-wrapped-unwrapped-styles-in-Mapped-convention-for-JSON-tp24319534p24353228.html Sent from the cxf-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.