On Mon July 6 2009 3:02:00 am Willem Jiang wrote: > Hi, > > I think this is a bug of CXF, if the user define the extension in the > service and binding, > we should use the service's value.
Agreed. Good catch. Dan > > Willem > > liucong wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > In the > > SOAP/JMS(http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-soapjms-20081121/#wsdl-11-propertie > >s). If a property is specified at multiple levels, the most specific > > setting will take precedence (port first, then service, then binding). > > > > But I invetigate the code of CXF. I find someting int > > org.apache.cxf.service.model.EndpointInfo.getTraversedExtensor(T > > defaultValue, Class<T> type): > > @Override > > public <T> T getTraversedExtensor(T defaultValue, Class<T> type) { > > T value = getExtensor(type); > > > > if (value == null) { > > if (value == null && binding != null) { > > value = binding.getExtensor(type); > > } > > > > if (service != null && value == null) { > > value = service.getExtensor(type); > > } > > > > if (value == null) { > > value = defaultValue; > > } > > } > > > > return value; > > } > > > > The code shou that:port first, then binding, then service. > > > > Now. Which is right? > > > > thanks. -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org http://www.dankulp.com/blog
