Yeah - I think its a good idea to put CXF DOSGi as a separate project in JIRA.
Thanks, David 2009/12/17 Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>: > > Is there any objections to moving the DOSGI stuff out to it's own JIRA? If > not, I'll do so on Friday. Speak now... :-) > > Dan > > > On Mon December 14 2009 2:39:17 pm Daniel Kulp wrote: >> Quick question: >> >> What are peoples thoughts about pulling the DOSGi stuff from the "CXF" JIRA >> into a separate CXFDOSGI (or just DOSGI) JIRA in the "Category: CXF" >> section at: >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/BrowseProjects.jspa >> >> There are pluses and minuses: >> DOSGi has it's own release schedule, own version numbers,etc.... Thus, >> having it's own project in JIRA allows it to track those things properly >> without it affecting the main CXF project. >> >> Also, DOSGi has it's own components such as its own build system, local vs >> remote discovery, etc... Having it's own JIRA project would allow >> defining nice components for it's own uses. >> >> On the minus side, it does kind of lower the visibility of the DOSGi issues >> in the CXF JIRA since they wouldn't be there. >> >> >> One COULD argue that JAX-RS could also be pulled out. However, the JAX-RS >> stuff is currently part of the main build and released as part of the full >> CXF stuff. Thus, keeping it in is less of an issue. If we eventually >> split the builds into a "core", "webservices", "rest", etc... then it may >> make sense to do so at that time. >> >> Thoughts? >> > > -- > Daniel Kulp > dk...@apache.org > http://www.dankulp.com/blog >
