On 4 June 2010 12:55, Sergey Beryozkin <sberyoz...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > >> >Having some properties in the CXF space "org.apache.cxf" seems to be >> > totally compliant ? Then they can be 'inherited' by cxf.ws, cxf.rs. >> >> Not entirely sure what you mean here, but a 'reverse domain' name is >> used here to avoid overlap between two technologies that are unaware >> of each other. Just like in Java Package names. So using just 'cxf.ws' >> is a shorter but not entirely compliant. >> >Well, I just was lazy typing 'org.apache'. Basically what I meant was that > using a property such > as 'org.apache.cxf.something' when configuring the service (soap/rest) using > does not seem like breaking the compliance rules
Well, actually it does break compliance as the spec says that the properties should be called: <configuration-type>.something Given that the configuration type is called org.apache.cxf.ws the property should be called org.apache.cxf.ws.<something> Cheers, David
