On Monday 27 September 2010 5:24:32 pm Sergey Beryozkin wrote: > > I've proposed using Dispatch<SOAPMessage>, but apparently, that was not an > option. I don't have more information. > I guess one possible reason they use SOAPConnection is that no service > QName is needed, may be for simple tests, etc. > > May be a factory like this one would better be deployed into the containers > with the stack(s) integrating with CXF.
That's kind of what I was thinking as well. Either that or just make it a "Knowledge Base" type thing that customers could use if they run into this type of issue. -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org http://dankulp.com/blog
