On Monday 15 November 2010 12:05:56 pm Scott Came wrote: > Thanks, Daniel. > What about the potential to leverage Sandesha or the implementation in > Metro? My research has indicated that some time ago there was discussion > about trying to create a reusable RM library that could do the job (with > adaptation) across the various open source implementations of WS-*. While > it seems that never went anywhere (probably with good reason) should I > have any hope of reusing significant chunks of code from either of those > efforts?
Well, for Sandesha, I haven't looked at the code there at all so I don't know how reasonable it is to reuse chunks of it. For WS-SecPol, I did use the Rampart code as a base, but it pretty much ended up as a complete re-write by the time I was done with it. Sandesha might be in the same ball park. For Metro, we cannot use the code at all as it's CDDL. We could potentially use the actual binary "metro jar" if it would work, but we cannot make any code changes or reuse the code or anything like that. Dan > Do we have any cross-participation with those efforts on the > list here? If anyone from the "couple of companies" you mention has > interest, please let me know. :) --Scott > -----Original Message----- > From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:dk...@apache.org] > Sent: Monday, November 15, 2010 8:46 AM > To: dev@cxf.apache.org > Cc: Scott Came > Subject: Re: Status of WS-RM > > On Monday 15 November 2010 11:33:53 am Scott Came wrote: > > Has anyone on the dev list looked into implementing WS-RM 1.1 since this > > discussion on the list last June? > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/cxf-dev/200906.mbox/%3C4A35E210. > > 5 030...@redhat.com%3e I'm guessing not, since the related JIRA issue is > > still "unassigned": https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-2681. > > I really don't think anyone has seriously looked at it recently. > > WS-RM is one of those specs that generally sends most of us running so it's > not likely something one of us "volunteers" is really going to tackle. > :-) There are a couple companies that could potentially put people on it > if the "price is right". > > > I > > have access to some resources to implement this feature. If anyone > > on-list is interested, please contact me directly. I'm also willing to > > help out, but feel it would be better to work with someone who has much > > more familiarity with the code. Thanks. > > That's super cool. Any help from anyone would be great. I would suggest > getting those that would be working on it involved here on the list. -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org http://dankulp.com/blog
