Willem, I'm just curious (this isn't a veto or anything), why was this needed? org.omg classes are built into the JDK and thus SHOULD be available in every OSGi runtime since it's built into the JDK. Basically, since it's JDK provided, it would always be resolved anyway and thus available.
Anyway, I'm just curious. :-) Dan On Monday 24 January 2011 9:02:15 am [email protected] wrote: > Author: ningjiang > Date: Mon Jan 24 14:02:15 2011 > New Revision: 1062778 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1062778&view=rev > Log: > CXF-3279 Marking the imports of the CORABA package to be optional > > Modified: > cxf/trunk/distribution/bundle/all/pom.xml > > Modified: cxf/trunk/distribution/bundle/all/pom.xml > URL: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/cxf/trunk/distribution/bundle/all/pom.xml?rev > =1062778&r1=1062777&r2=1062778&view=diff > ========================================================================== > ==== --- cxf/trunk/distribution/bundle/all/pom.xml (original) > +++ cxf/trunk/distribution/bundle/all/pom.xml Mon Jan 24 14:02:15 2011 > @@ -332,6 +332,7 @@ > org.junit*;resolution:=optional, > org.mozilla.javascript*;resolution:=optional, > org.objectweb.asm*;version="[2.0,4)", > + org.omg*;resolution:=optional, > > org.slf4j*;resolution:=optional;version="[1.5,2)", > org.springframework*;resolution:=optional;version="[2.5,4)", > javax.activation;version="[0.0,2)", -- Daniel Kulp [email protected] http://dankulp.com/blog
