+1 to the antbuild idea. On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 7:27 AM, Glen Mazza <[email protected]> wrote: > Sounds good. My WSDL-first tutorial shows how Ant can be used > (http://www.jroller.com/gmazza/entry/web_service_tutorial), I can > incorporate that into a new CXF sample (I've been meaning to rip out the Ant > from that tutorial anyway), or we can leverage the Ant scripts in the simple > wsdl-first and java-first examples for a new sample. > > In the interim, until we have this "antbuild", we could remove Ant from all > the samples except the two simplest (intro wsdl-first and java-first) > samples. Alternatively, we can skip doing "antbuild" and just retain the > Ant scripts for just these two newbie samples, for anything past that the > user will need to work with Maven. I think I would have a slight preference > for "antbuild" though as it would allow us to more thoroughly document how > to use Ant without being distracted about needing to also teach web services > (the main role of the two newbie samples), but either way is good IMO. > > Glen > > > Daniel Kulp wrote: >> >> There's another option I just thought of: >> >> Remove all the ant things from all the CURRENT samples. Then add a single >> "antbuild" sample that is pretty much just "hello world", but would show >> how >> to setup wsdl2java and such from within ant. That limits the ant >> exposure to >> a single, dedicated sample. That could probably cover Eric's and my >> concern >> about people that DO want to use ant, but pretty much keeps it away from >> the >> examples that we maintain and promote. >> >> Dan >> > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/Proposal-drop-ant-build-xml-files-for-samples-requiring-extra-stuff-tp3704042p3776811.html > Sent from the cxf-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
-- Principle Technical Writer Phone (781) 280-4174 Skype finnmccumial E-Mail [email protected] Blog http://documentingit.blogspot.com/
