I'd say either nuke it or update it to work with Maven. If it looks like nobody really cares about MTOSI, nuking it is probably the way to go.
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Glen Mazza <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Team, we have two MTOSI examples in the CXF samples list -- they're rather > old (presently not Mavenized). MTOSI seems to be largely inactive, with the > last blog post on it 17 months ago and no real analysis since mid-2009. > Should we nuke them (2.4 and Trunk branches)? If we're down to just 1 in a > 1000 possibly interested in it, rather than maintain it along with the rest > of the samples I'd rather we just refer them to the SVN repository. > > Here's the Wikipedia article on it: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MTOSI > (also not meaningfully edited since July 2009.) > > Thanks, > Glen > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/Remove-the-CXF-MTOSI-examples-tp4826982p4826982.html > Sent from the cxf-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > -- Principle Technical Writer FuseSource Phone: (781) 280-4174 E-Mail: [email protected] Blog: http://documentingit.blogspot.com/ Twitter: finnmccumial
