+1 from me. Colm.
On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Jeff Genender <jgenen...@apache.org> wrote: > I'm all for EOLing 2.4.x and its a long time coming… > > Jeff > > On Oct 6, 2012, at 5:54 AM, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote: > > > With 2.7.0 coming out real soon (voting on now), I'd like to discuss > whether we should make 2.4.10 the last for the 2.4.x line. 2.4.0 was > released 18 months ago. > > > > Last month, 2.4.x accounted for about 12% of the downloads from central, > but that's inline with the 11% for 2.3.x which we don't support. (Almost > 50% are on 2.6.x already. Great to see people updating and keeping > current.) Of the 12%, less than 10% of those were for 2.4.9 and 2.4.8 > (almost 75% were for 2.4.4 and lower) which shows very few people updating > on the 2.4.x line (which is concerning due to the security implications) or > if they are updating, they are moving to the more recent branches. > > > > Thoughts? > > > > -- > > Daniel Kulp > > dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog > > Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com > > > > -- Colm O hEigeartaigh Talend Community Coder http://coders.talend.com
