Hi Romain Was the idea it would be passed via one of rx() methods ?
Though we can def start with 1. for sure, what property name do you suggest ?
The look up (3.), would it require a non-SE dependency ? Cheers, Sergey On 07/10/17 17:18, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
Hi guys, seems CompletionStageRxInvokerImpl doesn't support a user defined executor nor a default EE managed executor. Would it be an option to default to these impl instead of relying on the JVM implementation which makes it hard to tune? High level algorithm would be: 1. if user defined a custom executor in properties use it 2. if user defined a pool configuration (min/max/core/queue sizes) then create a new pool 3. if default managed executor service (from EE) exists then use it - simple lookup should be good 4. use forkjoin default pool like today wdyt? Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
