I've introduced the property but it is set to false in 3.2.x

Sergey
On 07/10/17 17:17, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
Hi Dennis
Thanks very much, my fault really as I did not see a point in keeping this property in 3.2.x and indeed, as you imply, all tests were/are still passing, but I guess more preparation should've gone into it.

Setting a scan to true did never work in OSGI as far as I know, may be in some basic cases only, so in OSGI case, one nearly always has to set it to false anyway. I recall James Carman also suggesting to disable it by default. Then I also looked at

https://github.com/swagger-api/swagger-core/blob/master/modules/swagger-jaxrs/src/main/java/io/swagger/jaxrs/config/BeanConfig.java#L220

and could not see (and still do not see) how this property, if set to false, can have any effect on disabling the scan, the only thing I found that the actual setScan call was still needed.

But the problem came from the other angle :-).

I guess the easiest way around it is to return a setScan setter to 3.2.x, given that in some (I'd say - rare) cases uses depend on BeanConfig's implementation, but in 3.2.x keep this value by default to 'false' so that in most other cases people do not have do setScan(false).

Cheers, Sergey


On 07/10/17 13:47, Dennis Kieselhorst wrote:
Hi Taylor!
This causes the subsequent code (line 196):

BeanConfig beanConfig = appInfo == null
     ? new BeanConfig()
     : new ApplicationBeanConfig(appInfo.getProvider());

…to always instantiate an ApplicationBeanConfig object. Our production code relied on the BeanConfig’s implementation of its classes() method to grab our ReaderListener classes annotated with @SwaggerDefinition. Because a BeanConfig will never be instantiated this way anymore, we would no longer be able to use our current implementations of the ReaderListener interface.

Is this a known bug, or is there a workaround that I’m missing?

Can you create a PR with a unittest for your scenario?

Unfortunately there are many ways of using Swagger2Feature and obviously
we missed that one.

Regards
Dennis



--
Sergey Beryozkin

Talend Community Coders
http://coders.talend.com/

Reply via email to