One of the long standing ones :-), I think we should make both equally supported. John, could you please create a JIRA for this issue?
JDA> Hey guys JDA> Earlier today I was looking at an issue noted where proxies created for CXF JDA> weren't leveraging JAX-RS Features registered as providers. JDA> After digging into it further, I noticed that it was likely also true that JDA> they're not supported for WebClient. It seems like the key piece missing JDA> is that all of the support is within ConfigurationImpl, but these two JDA> stacks are using JAXRSClientFactoryBean as the underlying configuration. JDA> So I'm wondering, what makes more sense? Porting a Configuration object to JDA> be used within the proxy builder, or porting support for features directly JDA> into JAXRSClientFactoryBean. It does seem like there's a strong divide, JDA> ConfigurationImpl classes are using JAX-RS Features, JDA> but JAXRSClientFactoryBean classes are using the CXF native Features. JDA> John
